WASHINGTON - eTradeWire -- Quality assurance specialist Daryl Guberman has released shocking evidence via TIK-TOK video "The Certification Conspiracy: How Boeing Faked Aerospace Quality for 20 Years and Forced Everyone Else to Pay for It" showing that Boeing weaponized the global accreditation system against its own suppliers, mandating certifications, and fees under the threat of lost contracts — all while refusing to follow those same rules for over two decades.

"Boeing strong-armed its suppliers using old-school mob tactics (Lockheed Martin uses the same tactics)," said Guberman. "If your certificate wasn't accredited by ANSI-ANAB, your business with Boeing would not be used — even though Boeing didn't follow those rules itself for more than 20 years." https://aviationweek.com/air-transport/safety-ops-regulation/boeing-plans-seek-as9100-certification

It All Began on 9/11
The roots of this scandal trace back to the darkest day in modern American history: September 11, 2001. In the aftermath of the attacks, the aerospace industry was reeling. Just weeks later, Boeing released an internal notification warning that 20,000 to 30,000 employees could be laid off due to the collapse in air travel demand. https://theworldlink.com/boeing-to-cut-20-000-to-30-000-jobs-by-end-of-next-year/article_f633820c-ddac-5ba0-9641-2e0a7d90c0cf.html

Instead of doubling down on internal safety and quality, Boeing chose a different path — reducing its own responsibilities and shifting the burden onto suppliers.

April 2002: The First Supplier Notification

In April 2002, Boeing issued a supplier bulletin requiring certification to NADCAP (National Aerospace and Defense Contractors Accreditation Program) for special processes such as:

• Heat treating
• Welding
• Non-destructive testing

The bulletin stated that Boeing would only visit suppliers "if need be, or need arises," signaling a policy shift toward reduced internal inspections and increased reliance on third-party systems.

July 2002: The Certification Trap is Set

Three months later, in July 2002, Boeing issued a second supplier bulletin — this time demanding that all suppliers be certified to AS9100, the international aerospace quality management standard. But Boeing added a catch:

More on eTradeWire News

• Transparent LED Screens Turn Storefront Glass Into Digital Displays with SeeThruDisplays.com
• Moorpark College Theatre Arts Announces the Addition of New Faculty from the Entertainment Industry
• Eagle Motorsport Used Cars Expands Across Northwest Indiana with Bad Credit Auto Loans
• MASTERS by Winn Claybaugh Features Educator and NAHA Lifetime Achievement Award Winner Beth Minardi
• Frameology Celebrates 10 Years of Purpose-Driven Growth, Craftsmanship, and Innovation

Only AS9100 certifications accredited by ANSI (American National Standards Institute) and ANAB (American National Accreditation Board) would be accepted.

Boeing itself did not obtain AS9100 certification for over 20 years — finally doing so in August 2024.

Meanwhile, suppliers were required to:

• Register with the IAQG (International Aerospace Quality Group) OASIS database
• Pay mandatory database fees
• Face decertification if they failed to comply

The bulletin stated that Boeing would only visit suppliers "if need be, or need arises," signaling a policy shift toward reduced internal inspections and increased reliance on third-party systems.

QA Expert DARYL GUBERMAN Exposes Boeing's Removal of "Supplier Auditing Documents", Unveiling 22 Years of Neglected Oversight https://www.prlog.org/13059848-qa-expert-daryl-guberman-exposes-boeings-removal-of-supplier-auditing-documents-unveiling-22-years-of-neglected-oversight.html

The Global Cartel: ANSI, ANAB, IAF, ILAC

ANSI and ANAB — the two entities Boeing handpicked to accredit its suppliers — are not just U.S. institutions. Together, they founded the International Accreditation Forum (IAF), incorporated in Delaware, and its sister organization ILAC (International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation), headquartered in Australia IAF/ILAC are associations of national and international accreditation bodies equivalent to ANSI-ANAB accreditation. ANSI-ANAB are underwriters for IAF/ILAC which means they are responsible for any systematic or product failures.

These two groups coordinate a vast international accreditation regime that:

• Controls global access to markets
• Claims to "certify the certifiers"
• Shifts legal liability away from the corporations and onto unaccountable accreditation structures

This cartel operates with minimal transparency, and Boeing leveraged it to enforce compliance across its entire supply chain while remaining exempt from it internally.

Boeing's Grip on the IAQG

The IAQG — which oversees the OASIS supplier database — was heavily influenced by Boeing at the time. It allowed Boeing to:

• Help write the very rules suppliers had to follow
• Decide which registrars were "acceptable"
• Enforce compliance with the AS9100 standard while being uncertified themselves

This is the ultimate regulatory double standard: enforcement without adherence.

Who Watches the Watchers?

More on eTradeWire News

• Slayer Progression for Ironman Accounts: Farming Bloodvelds and Beyond
• 6-Year-Old Chef with Down Syndrome Shares Favorite Recipes in Uplifting New Cookbook
• The 2025 ESPY Awards After Party- Presented by Poppi & High Noon
• HD PHYSICAL THERAPY WAKEFIELD Introduces Shockwave Therapy to Enhance Patient Recovery & Pain Relief
• Squid Game Meets the Boardroom:New Research and Udemy Course Reveal the Hidden Geometry of Leadershi

You might expect federal regulators to step in — but here's the problem:

• The DOJ, DHS, FDA, and Department of Commerce all sit on ANSI and ANAB boards.
• These agencies are not just advisors — they're paying customers and governing members of the very accreditation system Boeing exploited.

"You can't expect the government to investigate when they're up to their nose in this mess," said Guberman.

"It's a rigged system. The agencies who should be regulating are instead enabling — or worse, profiting."

The Call to Action

Daryl Guberman is calling for:

• A federal investigation, independent of ANSI-ANAB, IAF and the IAQG
• A ban on federal agencies from participating in or financially supporting accreditation bodies they are meant to regulate
• A formal review of Boeing's quality assurance history from 2001 to 2024
• Public accountability for what he calls "the biggest quality hoax in aerospace history"

"It's time to strip away the veil," Guberman stated. "The American people — and our armed forces — deserve to know who's actually watching the skies."

About Daryl Guberman

Daryl Guberman is a nationally recognized quality assurance expert, truthsayer and founder of GUBERMAN-PMC, a U.S.-based private registrar standing outside the ANSI-ANAB monopoly. Since 2012, Guberman has publicly exposed foreign infiltration, federal conflicts of interest, and quality fraud at the highest levels of industry.

"There Are No Survivors" President Trump Speaks on DC Plane Crash https://www.prlog.org/13059538-there-are-no-survivors-president-trump-speaks-on-dc-plane-crash.html

Boeing's Strategic Changes Linked to CEO Compensation Growth and Oversight Concerns https://www.prlog.org/13050918-boeings-strategic-changes-linked-to-ceo-compensation-growth-and-oversight-concerns.html

40+ Year Quality Expert Daryl Guberman Exposes Boeing's 22-Year Supplier Auditing Loophole https://www.prlog.org/13050176-40-year-quality-expert-daryl-guberman-exposes-boeings-22-year-supplier-auditing-loophole.html

QA Expert Daryl Guberman Exposes 22 Years of Boeing's On-Site Audit Relinquishment and FAA Delegation Scandal https://www.prlog.org/13051547-qa-expert-daryl-guberman-exposes-22-years-of-boeings-on-site-audit-relinquishment-and-faa-delegation-scandal.html

Daryl Guberman Exposes Boeing's Two-Decade Quality and Accreditation Scandal https://www.prlog.org/13052432-daryl-guberman-exposes-boeings-two-decade-quality-and-accreditation-scandal.html