NEW CITY, N.Y. - eTradeWire -- What began as a single anomaly in Boeing's supplier documentation in July 2002 has now become the most expansive systemic quality-assurance failure in modern aerospace. Through a 22-year investigative funnel, quality expert Daryl Guberman has uncovered structural contradictions involving Boeing, ANAB, IAQG, federal agencies, and international actors that reveal a global breakdown reaching across aircraft manufacturing, accreditation oversight, regulatory controls, and the aerospace supply chain. These actions of Boeing, ANSI-ANAB, IAF-ILAC not only destroyed AS, ISO, IA, and their derivative certifications in the US and Worldwide, but also all ANAB foreign equivalent accreditation-certifications issued in aerospace, automotive, electronics, medical, food safety, banking, cybersecurity, and all industries. In essence the quality certifications system globally are destroyed!

Boeing International Film: "The Shields Of Death – Exposing Decades Of Uncertified Corruption" https://youtu.be/zweWbsIGc7o



STAGE 1 - THE TRIGGER (2001-2002)
After the 9/11 attacks, Boeing announced through CNN Money that it would lay off 20,000-30,000 employees. This restructuring triggered early surveillance into Boeing's quality posture and supplier requirements. The intent was not to uncover fraud, but the patterns uncovered a 22-year systemic failure.

STAGE 2 - THE FIRST ANOMALY (April-July 2002)
In April 2002, Boeing issued supplier bulletins referencing NADCAP for heat treatment, welding and non-destructive testing. By July 2002, AS9100 and ANAB accreditation contradictions emerged:

• Boeing referenced requirements that did not match IAQG rules.
• Boeing imposed certification demands it did not follow itself.
• Boeing had no AS9100 certification while mandating it from every supplier.

This formed the first structural crack in the system.

STAGE 3 - THE 17-YEAR WEBSITE RED FLAG (2008-2025)
Boeing's supplier portal continued to list ANSI-ASQ for 17 years after ASQ became ANAB in 2008. This was proof of organizational neglect:

• Boeing failed to update foundational quality documentation.
• Boeing's digital quality systems were unmonitored.
• Third-party call centers could not identify Boeing's own leadership.

This became Funnel Point 2, signaling deep systemic abandonment.

More on eTradeWire News

• VSURY Launches Elevated Digital Platform for Renowned Violinist Vijay Gupta
• Best Roofer Rio Rico Arizona: Different Roofing Costs Rio Rico AZ
• Digital Art Store PixfloraPrints Reflects Growing Shift Toward Printable Home Decor
• SoilCertify - Professional Grade, 10M Resolution Soil Intelligence At A Fraction Of The Cost
• If You Want to Understand Me, Understand This First

STAGE 4 - THE 2003 IAQG POWER PLAY
A 2003 IAQG/ANAB directive by ANSI-ANAB forced suppliers into the OASIS database - controlled 65% by Boeing. Suppliers were told they could not object to fees or data entry or their certificates would be removed. This placed Boeing in the role of global certifier while being uncertified itself.

STAGE 5 - THE 2009 SELF-CERTIFICATION FAILURE
The FAA's 2009 ODA structure allowed Boeing employees, paid by Boeing, to act as FAA designee s:

• They approved systems such as MCAS.(killed 346 people Indonesian & Ethiopian airlines 2018-2019)
• They operated without AS9100 internal controls.
• They had no independent FAA oversight.
• Boeing CEO in essence became the FAA Administrator representing Boeing.
• 2018-2019 Ethiopian & Indonesian crashes 346 people perish (FAA spokesperson 2019 states "FAA never allows a company to police itself of self-certify.

Boeing became both manufacturer and regulator - a catastrophic contradiction.

STAGE 6 - 2014 to 2024: THE MOST DAMNING CONTRADICTION
For ten years, Boeing sat on ANAB's Management Systems Accreditation Committee (MSAB), which grants, suspends, and withdraws certifications. During this decade:

• Boeing had no AS9100 certification.
• Boeing influenced global certification rules.
• Investment giants BlackRock, Fidelity, Vanguard, and State Street relied on the illusion of accredited compliance.
• Logistics giants - FedEx, UPS, DHL, Amazon Air - operated under the same illusion.

         An uncertified corporation governed the very system that certifies others.

STAGE 6b - FEDERAL AGENCIES IN THE FUNNEL
During this period, federal agencies, including DHS, DOJ, Department of Commerce, and FDA, sat on an ANSI-ANAB board tasked with oversight while also being customers of the certification system. This dual role created a structural conflict: agencies evaluated a process from which they benefited. Oversight appeared in place, yet Boeing continued uncertified operations, producing thousands of commercial and military aircraft under a regulatory blind spot.

STAGE 6c - FEDERAL SALARY CONFLICTS AND INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION FAILURES (2017-2019)
Key federal actors were financially entangled with private accreditation bodies:

• Philip Mattson (DHS) received $262,000 from ANSI while maintaining his federal salary.
• Gordon Gillerman (NIST/Commerce) received over $120,000 in additional payments to his federal salary.

Simultaneously, ANAB was advertised on the DHS website (2017-2018) for specialized certifications, creating both appearance of endorsement and a clear conflict of interest.

From 2015–2021, IAF oversight was led by Xiao Jianhua, a Communist Chinese national and CEO of CNAS Beijing. He assumed leadership of the International Accreditation Forum and had ties to U.S. quality systems since 1994. Given that ANSI-ANAB founded the IAF with federal agencies and corporations as members, Xiao could have transmitted information to China, as required by China's Intelligence Law, Article 7, mandating informational retrieval for the state.

More on eTradeWire News

• International Law Group Provides Emergency Legal Help for Venezuelans After TPS Expiration
• Why "I'm a Weak Trans" Argument Doesn't Work
• Sam's OATH Music Releases "Joy Anyway," a Song for Finding Joy While Living With Grief
• Los Angeles Skincare Practitioner Highlights Nervous System–Informed Approach to Beauty
• DJI Store USA Offers Up to 44% Off on Winter Sale

In January 2017, Xiao Jianhua issued a laboratory certification to an under prepared Wuhan lab. Within six months, U.S. specialists noted that staff lacked highly trained technicians. Complaints persisted into May 2019, when a CDC training document for virology labs globally mentioned only the Wuhan lab. Around the same time, Pamela Sale (ANSI-ANAB VP, Laboratory Accreditation) stated in deposition:

"One of the issues is that there is no commonly agreed-upon set of standards that forensics labs around the country have to follow. Instead, there are informal guidelines that labs can choose to follow or not."

Without formal protocols in the U.S., the lack of oversight for China and global labs represents a severe public health and safety risk.

STAGE 7 - APRIL 17, 2024: DHS SUBCOMMITTEE INTERVENTION
Guberman presented 2 documents from April-July 2002 to DHS Subcommittee (illustrating Boeing giving up onsite supplier auditing for certification submission). Only if need be or need arises  would Boeing visit the supplier and this would get rid of redundant inspections)

STAGE 8 - JUNE 2024: THE INTERNAL CONFESSION
Boeing VP of Quality, Elizabeth Lund, publicly admitted Boeing was "willing and prepared to get AS9100," confirming:

• Boeing had operated without AS9100 for 22 years. July 2002 - June 27,2024 and still are without the certification in 2025
• Only mock audits were performed.
• ~12,000 commercial aircraft including Ethiopian and Indonesian airline, Air-force One and 400+ military aircraft were produced in an uncertified environment.

STAGE 9 - OCTOBER 2024: FIELD EVIDENCE FROM BOEING'S WASHINGTON FACILITIES BY DARYL GUBERMAN EVERETT, RENTON, AUBURN, NORTHFIELD
Surveying 300-600 employees revealed:

• No employee knew what AS9100 was.
• No one knew Boeing was uncertified.
• Internal audit training was virtually nonexistent.

This represents complete internal collapse.

JANUARY 2026 - GLOBAL ACCREDITATION RESTRUCTURING
IAF (Delaware) and ILAC (Australia) will merge into GLOBAC, and AS9100 will transition to IA9100. No merger can erase Boeing's 23-year uncertified production history.

CONCLUSION - THE FULL FUNNEL SNAP
Across 23 years, the evidence reveals:

• False assumptions of compliance.
• An accreditation structure governed by an uncertified Boeing.
• Federal conflicts of interest undermining oversight.
• A global supply chain built on non-existent foundations.
• International lab and public health risks due to lack of standardized protocols.

This is the largest quality-assurance (INDUSTRIAL-FIDUCIARY)  failure in aerospace history - global, systemic, and decades deep. EXPOSED BY 40 YEAR QUALITY EXPERT DARYL GUBERMAN

Boeing–Airbus Accreditation Breakdown: How "Probably" Certificates Created Worldwide Risk https://www.prlog.org/13114262-boeingairbus-accreditation-breakdown-how-probably-certificates-created-worldwide-risk.html