Popular on eTradeWire
- Love 2 The World Celebration Global Tv Mega Event Concert For The 1st Time At Niagara Falls Fr - 619
- Mexico Hosts the First Cancun International Boat Show - 535
- Hoppr Taps Georges Laplanche to Develop Billion Dollar European Programmatic Advertising Market for Network Service Providers - 450
- ILoveInns.com Announces 2021 Top 10 Best Romantic Inns - 441
- Market-Connections Resume Writing Services Celebrates 10 Years in Business - 403
- Patrick Mahomes strikes twice by winning overall 2020 Hickok Belt(R) Award and January 2021 monthly - 401
- Aruba Environmental Credentials Further Strengthened - 382
- Travel Salaries Rise Marginally In 2020 But Recruitment Plummets - 340
- Residence Inn Fort Walton Beach, Florida Opens - 233
- Travelers Haven Achieves Unprecedented Quality and Customer Satisfaction Scores - 231
Similar on eTradeWire
- The Bar Association of D.C. Mourns the Loss of Vernon Jordan, Esq
- Kaufman & Kaufman, LLC. Advice When it Comes to Lump-Sum Payments
- Licensing Lawyer Daniel T. Geherin Discusses What You Should Know Before You Call
- Veritext Receives Hall of Fame Recognition in Best of National Law Journal/DC Reader Rankings Survey
- Grand Jury Investigation of Trump Beginning
- What to Know About Trucking Accidents & the Industry
- Registration Now Open for Ashton College's Free Immigration CPD Seminar (March 25, 2021)
- Pavese Law Firm adds Capps and Thompson as Managing Partners
- Empire Technologies Risk Management Group Expert to Speak at Multiple Industry Events in March
- Minneapolis Criminal Defense Lawyer Lynne Torgerson obtains dismissal of 3rd degree felony assault
Democrat Presiding Suspect, Raises Clear Issues of Conflict of Interest
WASHINGTON, D.C. (January 25, 2021) - The decision to have Senator Pat Leahy, the senior Democrat in the Senate, preside at the impeachment trial of former president Donald Trump may undercut the legitimacy of the proceeding, as well as raise serious conflict of interest issues, says public interest law professor John Banzhaf.
Some legal scholars, have argued that only a president who is still in office can be convicted and barred from holding office in the future.
This argument could be strengthened by not having the Chief Justice preside in the Senate trial, since the Constitution clearly states that "When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside."
Since it is the former president who "shall be removed from office" for acts and articles of impeachment adopted while he was still president, a strong argument can be made that it is the Chief Justice who should preside, and that not choosing him further undercuts the legitimacy of the impeachment trial.
More on eTradeWire News
- J&M Sanitation Deploys BYD Electric Refuse Trucks
- Book helping you understand your fur babies that may save their life
- Black Women Who Rock In Art, Culture & Entertainment Take Center Stage for Part Two of the Jackie Robinson Arts & Humanities Lecture Series
- Swimming Safari Swim School partners w/ Hope Floats -swim lessons for underprivileged kids
- Make Sure That Electric Car Does Not Run Out of Juice
It appears the the Founders provided for the Senate trial to be presided over by the Chief Justice in order to insure fairness, and the equally important appearance of fairness, by employing the person in government most likely to be - and to be seen - as impartial.
Substituting someone other than the Chief Justice to preside at the Senate impeachment trial seems to go directly contrary to this clear purpose.
Senator Leahy is the member of the political party which would clearly benefit if Trump were unable to run for president in 2024 as he has suggested he will.
Also, Leahy voted to convict Trump of both of the charges in the earlier impeachment; something which might ordinarily constitute bias, and disqualify a juror in an ordinary trial.
Since Leahy presumably would be entitled to vote, he would be serving as both judge and jury - or at least juror - something anathema to most legal traditions.
Regardless of the legal issues, which a court may never decide, having a partisan serve as presiding officer at a trial of a political opponent is likely to give rise to even more objections and concerns by many Republicans, and particularly by those millions of Americans who still support Trump, says Banzhaf.
- Hundreds of Rochester NY children perform online for the world
- First look: Clark Nexsen completes engineering building at NC State University
- Will the World Step in and Save Paul Rusesabagina?
- Crescent City's March 12-14 Spring Estates Auction will kick off with couture purses, fine jewelry
- Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices Florida Properties Group's Be The Sunshine Volunteer Week
- Orchestry Announces Partnership with Softchoice to Make Work Simple in Microsoft 365
- Koenig Equipment Opens the Doors to New Franklin Facility
- Tammy L. Hein Announces the Release of Ways You Could Be Sabotaging Your Training
- Margaret Ann Spence Announces the Release of Joyous Lies
- Chicago Interior Designer Wins International Award
- African American Female Entrepreneur Executive Produces New Sitcom
- New Website Provides Consumers with Insurance Information and Access to Local Agents
- Award-Winning Chiropractic Firm Revitalizes Historic County Park
- The Q iLASIK & Med Spa to Host Grand Opening to Benefit Imagine Children's Center
- Successful Las Vegas Promoter Developing Her Own Talk Show
- How Far Would You Go in a Treasure Hunt for Happiness?
- Modern Campus Launches Digital Engagement Experience
- Upcoming Local-Lit Event at Unicoi County Public Library!
- Bay Area filmmaker, comedian to talk about stuttering at British arts festival
- Naples teen recognized as Boys & Girls Club's Youth of the Year