Popular on eTradeWire


Similar on eTradeWire

Federal Judge Forcing Parents to Abandon Children

eTradeWire News/10589857
545 Kids Already "Lost" - Hobson's Choice and COVID Exacerbates Problem

WASHINGTON - eTradeWire -- Federal Judge Dolly Gee is reportedly pressuring lawyers representing migrants in U.S. custody to accept a settlement under which parents would be faced with a Hobson's rock-or-hard-place choice: give up their children, or have them remain in an immigration jail, in order to insure that the parents will show up for scheduled hearings.

Public interest law professor John Banzhaf, in an amicus curiae brief, opposed this approach, arguing that the government can insure the appearance of migrants at hearings, without imprisoning them along with their children, by a variety of proven and inexpensive electronic means, and thus eliminate the need for detention in hotels or elsewhere.

Banzhaf's amicus brief noted that there are many simple, inexpensive, and proven methods which the government can use to insure that parents who are released do appear for required legal hearings, thereby making detention of entire families unnecessary.

Other treaties such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which the U.S. has also ratified, prohibits arbitrary detention and the deprivation of liberty, including for children.  The ICCPR holds that detention should only be used with an individualized determination of a need to detain, which should then be periodically reviewed by an independent court.

More on eTradeWire News
Thus, a blanket detention policy - for completely innocent children as well as adults - for all illegal crossings may be in violation of international law and generally accepted norms and rights.

Banzhaf also cited many different U.S. court decisions which have recognized that, aside from whatever rights might be provided by the Due Process clause, there are separate broad rights related to child rearing and families which have long been recognized as falling under the broad right of privacy also established by the Constriction.

He also noted that threatening to hold children in detention for extensive periods of time if parents do not agree to abandon them is especially coercive because of the growing risk of COVID-10, especially for children detained with their parents, and thus kept in confinement under sub-standard health conditions, and with the limited care children and/or parents are likely to receive while in confinement should they contract COVID-19.

 http://banzhaf.net/ jbanzhaf3ATgmail.com @profbanzhaf

Contact
GW LAW
***@gmail.com


Source: Public Interest Law Professor John Banzhaf
stats
Filed Under: Legal

Show All News | Report Violation

0 Comments