WASHINGTON - eTradeWire -- Even if U.S. Judge Tanya Chutkan grants the motion by special counsel seeking a narrowly tailored gag order on Donald Trump, it will still contain a hole big enough to drive a wrecking truck through, and there may be nothing the court can do about it, says public interest law professor John Banzhaf.

Thus, even if Trump does not defy the order once issued, many of his supporters - including members of Congress, talk show hosts, and members of PACs - can still do exactly what is prohibited by the order.

Moreover, there is nothing in the order which would prevent Trump himself from imploring those who believe in him and in his innocence from doing exactly what the order bans: making "statements regarding the identity, testimony, or credibility of prospective witnesses" or "statements about any party, witness, attorney, court personnel, or potential jurors that are disparaging and inflammatory, or intimidating."

More on eTradeWire News

• From Public Sector to Private Practice
• Live and Let Live Foundation Presents 'Comedy and Music for Freedom and Peace' Fundraiser in Mesa, AZ
• Knobull Makes Sure That Job Seekers Stand Out In The Crowded Market
• Exploring Midlife Changes: Perimenopause, Menopause, and Andropause
• Embracing Menopause At Work Workshop:

Members of Congress who have spoken out on behalf of Trump, and also well financed political action committees (PACs), groups such as the Proud Boys or the Oath Keepers, as well as numerous individual talk show hosts, podcasters, and other "influencers" who collectively reach and influence tens of millions of people are not parties to the proceeding, and therefore would not limited in any way by the proposed limited gag order.

To take an extreme example, Trump would not be prohibited by the proposed limited gag order from saying to a PAC, talk show host, or other supporter:

"My unamerican enemies have violated my First Amendment rights with a unconstitutional gag order, so you must do what I cannot do myself.  Please go out and make statements regarding the identity, testimony, or credibility of prospective witnesses, and also statements about the parties, witnesses, attorneys, court personnel, are potential jurors that are disparaging and inflammatory, or intimidating.  You know who they are - so I'm counting on you to protect me and democracy by speaking out on my behalf because I cannot do it myself.  To protect yourself, simply say you are speaking out as a loyal American patriot with no intent whatsoever to intimidate or otherwise tamper with anybody."

More on eTradeWire News

• Tulsa Air and Space Museum Welcomes Vintage Aircraft for WARBIRD WEEKEND
• Los Caminantes In Memory of Agustin Event
• Orange County Acting Academy Embarks on a New Journey with Fall Classes Starting on September 30th
• The War of the Worlds: The 1938 Radio Script
• AMERICAST Provides PreCast Pads to Charge Stations

Professor Banzhaf filed the formal legal complaint which led to the investigation and indictment of Trump in Georgia, but he has played no role in Trump's federal criminal proceedings.

So the irony is that if the motion is granted and the gag order issued - and if Trump, rather than defying it, simply asks his supporters to repeat his claims - more people are likely to accept the claims coming from many different sources rather than any claim coming from Trump.

http://banzhaf.net/   jbanzhaf3ATgmail.com   @profbanzhaf